Knoi and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Knoi: AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, summarizes, and translates meetings, with team organization and Q&A. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Knoi when documenting and summarizing team meetings automatically matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, summarizes, and translates meetings, with team organization and Q&A.
AI Q&A that answers questions about meeting contentAutomatic summaries, highlights, and action items after meetingsChannel-based organization of notes by team, project, or department
Knoi is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio
Standout feature
Automatic summaries, highlights, and action items after meetings
Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings
Team usage
Live translation across multiple languages including Korean and English
Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace
Integrations
Channel-based organization of notes by team, project, or department
Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects
Languages & capture
AI Q&A that answers questions about meeting content
Automatic meeting detection on Mac
Best-fit workflow
Custom summary templates for reports and updates
60+ language support with automatic detection
Best for
Knoi
Choose Knoi if you need documenting and summarizing team meetings automatically — strengths include strong support for korean-english multilingual meetings.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Pros & cons
Knoi
+ Strong support for Korean-English multilingual meetings
+ Automatically organizes and makes past meetings searchable
- Translation is limited to a small set of languages
Tana
+ Captures meetings without adding a bot to the call
+ Meeting notes flow into a connected, structured knowledge base
- Requires the Tana desktop app and adopting its outliner workflow
FAQ
Is Knoi or Tana better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Knoi is strong for documenting and summarizing team meetings automatically, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Knoi and Tana compare on price?
Knoi is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Knoi and Tana?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Knoi vs Tana: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo