Klu and Wudpecker are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Klu: AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools. Wudpecker: AI notetaker that records meetings and generates structured, template-based summaries for sales and customer teams. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Klu when sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls matters most, and Wudpecker when sales discovery call notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools.
AI notetaker that records meetings and generates structured, template-based summaries for sales and customer teams.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wudpecker is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Klu | Wudpecker |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Browser extension auto-join, Mac desktop app, and offline in-person capture | Recording and transcription |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription with speaker recognition and multilingual support | Template-based AI summaries |
| Team usage | AI-generated bullet-point summaries, action items, and custom note sections | Action items and key points |
| Integrations | Follow-up detection with owner assignment and deadlines, pushed to Slack or Notion | Sharing and integrations |
| Languages & capture | CRM logging to HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive; Attio/Affinity via Zapier | Multi-language support |
| Best-fit workflow | Cross-meeting Deep Dive and Ask AI search across past meetings | Recording and transcription |
Klu
Choose Klu if you need sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls — strengths include combines meeting notes with follow-up assignment and crm logging in one tool.
Wudpecker
Choose Wudpecker if you need sales discovery call notes — strengths include consistent, template-driven summaries.
Klu
Wudpecker
It depends on your workflow. Klu is strong for sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls, while Wudpecker is strong for sales discovery call notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wudpecker is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.