Klu and NoteWave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Klu: AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools. NoteWave: An indie AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, in-person, and uploaded audio. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Klu when sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls matters most, and NoteWave when capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools.
An indie AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, in-person, and uploaded audio.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); NoteWave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Klu | NoteWave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Browser extension auto-join, Mac desktop app, and offline in-person capture | Records and transcribes meetings from Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, browser, and mobile |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription with speaker recognition and multilingual support | Uploads and transcribes existing audio files (MP3, WAV, M4A) |
| Team usage | AI-generated bullet-point summaries, action items, and custom note sections | Speaker identification and AI-generated summaries |
| Integrations | Follow-up detection with owner assignment and deadlines, pushed to Slack or Notion | Automatic topic tagging and action-item detection |
| Languages & capture | CRM logging to HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive; Attio/Affinity via Zapier | Assistant for querying past meetings in natural language |
| Best-fit workflow | Cross-meeting Deep Dive and Ask AI search across past meetings | Multilingual transcription support |
Klu
Choose Klu if you need sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls — strengths include combines meeting notes with follow-up assignment and crm logging in one tool.
NoteWave
Choose NoteWave if you need capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet — strengths include captures both online and in-person meetings plus uploaded audio in one tool.
Klu
NoteWave
It depends on your workflow. Klu is strong for sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls, while NoteWave is strong for capturing notes and action items from remote calls across zoom, teams, and google meet. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades and NoteWave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.