Klu and Minutes are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Klu: AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Klu when sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls matters most, and Minutes when building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Klu | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Browser extension auto-join, Mac desktop app, and offline in-person capture | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription with speaker recognition and multilingual support | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what |
| Team usage | AI-generated bullet-point summaries, action items, and custom note sections | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk |
| Integrations | Follow-up detection with owner assignment and deadlines, pushed to Slack or Notion | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history |
| Languages & capture | CRM logging to HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive; Attio/Affinity via Zapier | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction |
| Best-fit workflow | Cross-meeting Deep Dive and Ask AI search across past meetings | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode |
Klu
Choose Klu if you need sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls — strengths include combines meeting notes with follow-up assignment and crm logging in one tool.
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
Klu
Minutes
It depends on your workflow. Klu is strong for sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls, while Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades and Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.