Klu and MeetingBot are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Klu: AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools. MeetingBot: Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Klu when sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls matters most, and MeetingBot when developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools.
Open-source meeting bot API that sends bots into Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom to record calls, deployable to your own AWS infrastructure.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Klu | MeetingBot |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Browser extension auto-join, Mac desktop app, and offline in-person capture | Bot deployment to Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription with speaker recognition and multilingual support | REST API for managing bots and accessing recordings, transcripts, and metadata |
| Team usage | AI-generated bullet-point summaries, action items, and custom note sections | Visual dashboard for bot management and data viewing |
| Integrations | Follow-up detection with owner assignment and deadlines, pushed to Slack or Notion | Infrastructure-as-code self-hosting via Terraform on AWS |
| Languages & capture | CRM logging to HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive; Attio/Affinity via Zapier | Scalable AWS ECS-based deployment |
| Best-fit workflow | Cross-meeting Deep Dive and Ask AI search across past meetings | TypeScript stack with Next.js, Express, PostgreSQL, tRPC, and Drizzle ORM |
Klu
Choose Klu if you need sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls — strengths include combines meeting notes with follow-up assignment and crm logging in one tool.
MeetingBot
Choose MeetingBot if you need developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom — strengths include open source and self-hostable so meeting data stays in your own aws account.
Klu
MeetingBot
It depends on your workflow. Klu is strong for sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls, while MeetingBot is strong for developers building products that need automated meeting recording across google meet, teams, and zoom. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades and MeetingBot is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.