KI-note and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | Typist |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Support for a wide range of languages and accents |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
KI-note
Typist
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.