KI-note and Transkriptor are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. Transkriptor: AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and Transkriptor when transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
AI speech-to-text platform that transcribes meetings, interviews, lectures and audio/video files into editable text in many languages.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | Transkriptor |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Automatic transcription of uploaded audio/video files and links |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | Direct meeting capture and transcription for Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | Speaker diarization that labels individual speakers |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Support for transcription in 100+ languages plus translation |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | AI assistant and AI chat to summarize transcripts and answer questions |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | SRT subtitle export and in-browser transcript editing |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
Transkriptor
Choose Transkriptor if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations — strengths include handles many input methods (file upload, link, recording, and live meetings).
KI-note
Transkriptor
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while Transkriptor is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research conversations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Transkriptor is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.