KI-note and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
KI-note
Tana
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.