KI-note and Subanana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. Subanana: Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and Subanana when transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
Hong Kong AI transcription and subtitling platform with meeting transcription, summaries, and multilingual support.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | Subanana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | AI transcription and subtitle generation across 80+ languages |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | Strong handling of mixed Cantonese-and-English (code-switching) audio |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | Meeting transcription with automated summaries and action items |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Real-time voice transcription with live translation |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | Automatic speaker identification |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Subtitle embedding and export to .srt, .docx, .csv, and .txt |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
Subanana
Choose Subanana if you need transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams — strengths include built for the hong kong market with strong cantonese and code-switching support.
KI-note
Subanana
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while Subanana is strong for transcribing and summarizing cantonese-english meetings for hong kong teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Subanana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.