KI-note and SpeechText.AI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. SpeechText.AI: AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and SpeechText.AI when transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
AI speech-to-text service that transcribes interviews, meetings and podcasts with speaker ID, domain models and searchable audio.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | SpeechText.AI |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Automatic transcription of uploaded audio and video files |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | Speaker identification across multi-participant recordings |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | Support for 30+ languages with regional accents |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Domain-optimized models for fields like healthcare, finance and legal |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | Interactive transcript editing and verification tools |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Natural-language search inside audio recordings |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
SpeechText.AI
Choose SpeechText.AI if you need transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements — strengths include domain-specific models can improve accuracy on specialized terminology.
KI-note
SpeechText.AI
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while SpeechText.AI is strong for transcribing research and journalistic interviews with privacy requirements. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and SpeechText.AI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.