KI-note and Mr. Transcription are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. Mr. Transcription: Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and Mr. Transcription when creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
Japanese AI transcription service (文字起こしさん) that converts audio, video, images, and PDFs to text and can auto-summarize recordings into meeting minutes.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | Mr. Transcription |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Transcription of audio, video, image, and PDF files in the browser |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | AI summarization that turns recordings into meeting minutes with key points |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | Subtitle generation in SRT and VTT formats |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Translation across 100+ languages with automatic language detection |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | Speaker recognition and a customizable terminology dictionary |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Privacy-focused paid plans described as keeping no logs |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
Mr. Transcription
Choose Mr. Transcription if you need creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings — strengths include handles large files and a wide range of input formats including pdfs and images.
KI-note
Mr. Transcription
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while Mr. Transcription is strong for creating meeting minutes and summaries from uploaded recordings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mr. Transcription is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.