KI-note and Luster are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. Luster: AI Predictive Enablement platform that pairs realistic sales roleplay with live-call analysis to find and close rep skill gaps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and Luster when letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
AI Predictive Enablement platform that pairs realistic sales roleplay with live-call analysis to find and close rep skill gaps.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Luster is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | Luster |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | AI roleplay environment for rehearsing discovery, objection handling, and other high-stakes scenarios |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | Buyer personas configurable by sales stage, persona type, and deal size |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | EchoIQ live-call analysis that reviews real customer conversations for skill application |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Predictive insights that flag rep readiness risk and skill gaps |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | AI-assisted coaching tools for managers to scale feedback |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Certification and onboarding workflows for enablement teams |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
Luster
Choose Luster if you need letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls — strengths include connects practice performance with analysis of real live calls rather than roleplay alone.
KI-note
Luster
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while Luster is strong for letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Luster is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.