KI-note and Klu are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. Klu: AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and Klu when sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export.
AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | KI-note | Klu |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Browser extension auto-join, Mac desktop app, and offline in-person capture |
| Standout feature | Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment | Real-time transcription with speaker recognition and multilingual support |
| Team usage | Canvas-style protocol editing interface | AI-generated bullet-point summaries, action items, and custom note sections |
| Integrations | Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input | Follow-up detection with owner assignment and deadlines, pushed to Slack or Notion |
| Languages & capture | Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls | CRM logging to HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive; Attio/Affinity via Zapier |
| Best-fit workflow | Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews | Cross-meeting Deep Dive and Ask AI search across past meetings |
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
Klu
Choose Klu if you need sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls — strengths include combines meeting notes with follow-up assignment and crm logging in one tool.
KI-note
Klu
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while Klu is strong for sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.