Kai for Chrome and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Kai for Chrome: A Chrome extension that transcribes and summarizes meetings entirely on-device in the browser, with no bot, no account, and no upload. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-transcription workflows, shortlist Kai for Chrome when privately transcribing google meet, zoom web, or teams calls inside chrome matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A Chrome extension that transcribes and summarizes meetings entirely on-device in the browser, with no bot, no account, and no upload.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
Kai for Chrome is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Kai for Chrome | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Fully on-device transcription in the browser via Whisper on WebGPU or WebAssembly | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | Bot-free capture from Google Meet, Zoom web, Teams, and any Chrome audio tab | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | No account or sign-up required to start transcribing | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Keyboard-shortcut recording with a live transcript side panel | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Local summaries with decisions, topics, and assigned action items | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | One-click optional email sharing of finished notes | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
Kai for Chrome
Choose Kai for Chrome if you need privately transcribing google meet, zoom web, or teams calls inside chrome — strengths include audio and transcription stay on-device for strong privacy.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Kai for Chrome
toruno
It depends on your workflow. Kai for Chrome is strong for privately transcribing google meet, zoom web, or teams calls inside chrome, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Kai for Chrome is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.