Kai for Chrome and Meetily are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Kai for Chrome: A Chrome extension that transcribes and summarizes meetings entirely on-device in the browser, with no bot, no account, and no upload. Meetily: Open-source, privacy-first AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on your own device. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Kai for Chrome when privately transcribing google meet, zoom web, or teams calls inside chrome matters most, and Meetily when privacy-conscious teams that need meeting notes without sending audio to the cloud matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A Chrome extension that transcribes and summarizes meetings entirely on-device in the browser, with no bot, no account, and no upload.
Bot-free capture from Google Meet, Zoom web, Teams, and any Chrome audio tabFully on-device transcription in the browser via Whisper on WebGPU or WebAssemblyKeyboard-shortcut recording with a live transcript side panel
Open-source, privacy-first AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on your own device.
AI summaries highlighting key decisions and action itemsBot-free capture via system audio (no visible meeting participant)Customizable summary templates and Markdown export
Kai for Chrome is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Meetily is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Fully on-device transcription in the browser via Whisper on WebGPU or WebAssembly
Local, on-device recording, transcription, and summarization
Standout feature
Bot-free capture from Google Meet, Zoom web, Teams, and any Chrome audio tab
Bot-free capture via system audio (no visible meeting participant)
Team usage
No account or sign-up required to start transcribing
Works across Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Discord, and in-person meetings
Integrations
Keyboard-shortcut recording with a live transcript side panel
AI summaries highlighting key decisions and action items
Languages & capture
Local summaries with decisions, topics, and assigned action items
Customizable summary templates and Markdown export
Best-fit workflow
One-click optional email sharing of finished notes
Open-source (MIT licensed) with self-hosting option
Best for
Kai for Chrome
Choose Kai for Chrome if you need privately transcribing google meet, zoom web, or teams calls inside chrome — strengths include audio and transcription stay on-device for strong privacy.
Meetily
Choose Meetily if you need privacy-conscious teams that need meeting notes without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include strong privacy posture since audio and processing stay on the user's device.
Pros & cons
Kai for Chrome
+ Audio and transcription stay on-device for strong privacy
+ No bot joins the call and no account is needed to get started
- Requires a recent version of Chrome and works only within the browser
Meetily
+ Strong privacy posture since audio and processing stay on the user's device
+ Open-source and self-hostable for full control
- Local processing depends on the user's own hardware for performance
FAQ
Is Kai for Chrome or Meetily better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Kai for Chrome is strong for privately transcribing google meet, zoom web, or teams calls inside chrome, while Meetily is strong for privacy-conscious teams that need meeting notes without sending audio to the cloud. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Kai for Chrome and Meetily compare on price?
Kai for Chrome is a free tier with paid upgrades and Meetily is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Kai for Chrome and Meetily?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.