JotMe and TeamRetro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. JotMe: Multilingual AI meeting assistant offering live translation, transcription, and notes in many languages across major conferencing platforms. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist JotMe when cross-border teams holding meetings in multiple languages matters most, and TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Multilingual AI meeting assistant offering live translation, transcription, and notes in many languages across major conferencing platforms.
Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries.
JotMe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | JotMe | TeamRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time live translation across a large set of languages | Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting |
| Standout feature | Multilingual transcription with speaker labels | AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes |
| Team usage | AI meeting notes, summaries, key decisions and action items | AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization) |
| Integrations | 'Ask JotMe' query interface for past sessions | Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time |
| Languages & capture | Bot-free capture plus mobile app and Chrome extension | Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex | Action-item tracking carried across sessions |
JotMe
Choose JotMe if you need cross-border teams holding meetings in multiple languages — strengths include strong multilingual translation and transcription focus.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
JotMe
TeamRetro
It depends on your workflow. JotMe is strong for cross-border teams holding meetings in multiple languages, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
JotMe is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.