JotMe and Meeting Metrics are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. JotMe: Multilingual AI meeting assistant offering live translation, transcription, and notes in many languages across major conferencing platforms. Meeting Metrics: Swiss AI meeting intelligence platform with transcription, summaries and analytics, processed and stored on Swiss servers. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist JotMe when cross-border teams holding meetings in multiple languages matters most, and Meeting Metrics when transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Multilingual AI meeting assistant offering live translation, transcription, and notes in many languages across major conferencing platforms.
Swiss AI meeting intelligence platform with transcription, summaries and analytics, processed and stored on Swiss servers.
JotMe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Meeting Metrics is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | JotMe | Meeting Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time live translation across a large set of languages | Automatic transcription, summaries and meeting analytics |
| Standout feature | Multilingual transcription with speaker labels | Speaker recognition with customizable summary templates |
| Team usage | AI meeting notes, summaries, key decisions and action items | Interactive chat to search and query meeting content |
| Integrations | 'Ask JotMe' query interface for past sessions | Strong German and Swiss German language support across many languages |
| Languages & capture | Bot-free capture plus mobile app and Chrome extension | Processing and storage on Swiss servers, with local-AI enterprise options |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex | Automatic transcription, summaries and meeting analytics |
JotMe
Choose JotMe if you need cross-border teams holding meetings in multiple languages — strengths include strong multilingual translation and transcription focus.
Meeting Metrics
Choose Meeting Metrics if you need transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings — strengths include swiss data sovereignty with processing and storage in switzerland.
JotMe
Meeting Metrics
It depends on your workflow. JotMe is strong for cross-border teams holding meetings in multiple languages, while Meeting Metrics is strong for transcribing and analyzing german and swiss german meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
JotMe is a free tier with paid upgrades and Meeting Metrics is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.