joinly and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. joinly: Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist joinly when building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | joinly | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | Real-time transcription with timestamps and speaker information, subscribable for live updates | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Modular speech-to-text and text-to-speech backends (Whisper, Deepgram, Kokoro, ElevenLabs) | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Model-agnostic: works with OpenAI, Anthropic, and local LLMs via Ollama | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image | Automatic capture and transcription |
joinly
Choose joinly if you need building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls — strengths include fully open source (mit) and self-hostable for complete data control.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
joinly
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. joinly is strong for building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.