Jamie and Koji are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Jamie: Bot-free AI notetaker that captures meeting audio on your device and generates summaries and action items. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Jamie when private, bot-free meeting notes matters most, and Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Jamie is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale
Standout feature
AI summaries and action items
AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief
Team usage
Works on any platform and in person
Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment
Integrations
Multi-language support
Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations
Languages & capture
Quick post-meeting notes
Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes
Best-fit workflow
Bot-free, on-device capture
MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion
Best for
Jamie
Choose Jamie if you need private, bot-free meeting notes — strengths include no bot in the participant list.
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
Pros & cons
Jamie
+ No bot in the participant list
+ Platform-agnostic, including in-person meetings
- On-device capture rather than a server-side bot
Koji
+ Removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously
- AI-moderated async format is less suited to deep rapport-driven live interviews
FAQ
Is Jamie or Koji better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Jamie is strong for private, bot-free meeting notes, while Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Jamie and Koji compare on price?
Jamie is a free tier with paid upgrades and Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Jamie and Koji?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.