Interprefy and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Interprefy: Enterprise platform offering AI speech translation and live captions plus remote human interpretation for meetings, webinars, and events. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Interprefy when running a large multilingual conference with ai and human interpretation matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Enterprise platform offering AI speech translation and live captions plus remote human interpretation for meetings, webinars, and events.
Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages.
Interprefy is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Interprefy | Tiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time AI speech-to-speech translation | Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries |
| Standout feature | AI live captions and subtitles across thousands of language combinations | Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Optional remote simultaneous interpretation by professional interpreters | Real-time translation across multiple languages |
| Integrations | Attendee agent for joining meetings and receiving translation in a chosen language | Speaker diarization and one-click note templates |
| Languages & capture | Web platform, mobile app, and custom meeting-platform integrations | AI chat to ask questions about a meeting |
| Best-fit workflow | Enterprise security with ISO 27001 certification and end-to-end encryption | Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture |
Interprefy
Choose Interprefy if you need running a large multilingual conference with ai and human interpretation — strengths include offers both ai and professional human interpretation in one platform.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
Interprefy
Tiro
It depends on your workflow. Interprefy is strong for running a large multilingual conference with ai and human interpretation, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Interprefy is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.