Interactio and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Interactio: Multilingual meeting and event platform combining real-time human and AI interpretation with live captions across Zoom, Teams, and Webex. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Interactio when interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Multilingual meeting and event platform combining real-time human and AI interpretation with live captions across Zoom, Teams, and Webex.
Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages.
Interactio is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Interactio | Tiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time human interpretation with certified interpreters | Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries |
| Standout feature | AI translation and mixed human-plus-AI interpretation in one meeting | Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Live captions for multilingual sessions | Real-time translation across multiple languages |
| Integrations | Smartphone listener app for onsite attendees | Speaker diarization and one-click note templates |
| Languages & capture | Integrations with Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Webex | AI chat to ask questions about a meeting |
| Best-fit workflow | Dedicated moderator, participant, interpreter, and AV control consoles | Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture |
Interactio
Choose Interactio if you need interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex — strengths include supports onsite, hybrid, and fully virtual multilingual events.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
Interactio
Tiro
It depends on your workflow. Interactio is strong for interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Interactio is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.