Interactio and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Interactio: Multilingual meeting and event platform combining real-time human and AI interpretation with live captions across Zoom, Teams, and Webex. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Interactio when interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Multilingual meeting and event platform combining real-time human and AI interpretation with live captions across Zoom, Teams, and Webex.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Interactio is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Interactio | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time human interpretation with certified interpreters | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | AI translation and mixed human-plus-AI interpretation in one meeting | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Live captions for multilingual sessions | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Smartphone listener app for onsite attendees | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Integrations with Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Webex | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | Dedicated moderator, participant, interpreter, and AV control consoles | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
Interactio
Choose Interactio if you need interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex — strengths include supports onsite, hybrid, and fully virtual multilingual events.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Interactio
Mina
It depends on your workflow. Interactio is strong for interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Interactio is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.