Interactio and Luster are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Interactio: Multilingual meeting and event platform combining real-time human and AI interpretation with live captions across Zoom, Teams, and Webex. Luster: AI Predictive Enablement platform that pairs realistic sales roleplay with live-call analysis to find and close rep skill gaps. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Interactio when interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex matters most, and Luster when letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Multilingual meeting and event platform combining real-time human and AI interpretation with live captions across Zoom, Teams, and Webex.
AI Predictive Enablement platform that pairs realistic sales roleplay with live-call analysis to find and close rep skill gaps.
Interactio is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Luster is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Interactio | Luster |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time human interpretation with certified interpreters | AI roleplay environment for rehearsing discovery, objection handling, and other high-stakes scenarios |
| Standout feature | AI translation and mixed human-plus-AI interpretation in one meeting | Buyer personas configurable by sales stage, persona type, and deal size |
| Team usage | Live captions for multilingual sessions | EchoIQ live-call analysis that reviews real customer conversations for skill application |
| Integrations | Smartphone listener app for onsite attendees | Predictive insights that flag rep readiness risk and skill gaps |
| Languages & capture | Integrations with Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Webex | AI-assisted coaching tools for managers to scale feedback |
| Best-fit workflow | Dedicated moderator, participant, interpreter, and AV control consoles | Certification and onboarding workflows for enablement teams |
Interactio
Choose Interactio if you need interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex — strengths include supports onsite, hybrid, and fully virtual multilingual events.
Luster
Choose Luster if you need letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls — strengths include connects practice performance with analysis of real live calls rather than roleplay alone.
Interactio
Luster
It depends on your workflow. Interactio is strong for interpreting a hybrid conference for attendees on zoom, teams, or webex, while Luster is strong for letting sdrs and aes rehearse cold calls and discovery conversations with ai buyers before live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Interactio is a free tier with paid upgrades and Luster is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.