IceCubes and ownscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. IceCubes: Bot-free Chrome and Edge extension that reads a meeting platform's own captions to transcribe and summarize Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls. ownscribe: Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist IceCubes when teams that need notes without a bot joining due to it or compliance constraints matters most, and ownscribe when developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Bot-free Chrome and Edge extension that reads a meeting platform's own captions to transcribe and summarize Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls.
Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes.
IceCubes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | IceCubes | ownscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Chrome and Edge browser extensions | Local-first recording, transcription, and summarization via CLI |
| Standout feature | Bot-free capture by reading the platform's own closed captions | System audio capture on macOS 14.2+ through Core Audio |
| Team usage | Speaker identification mapped from the meeting UI | WhisperX transcription with word-level timestamps |
| Integrations | AI summaries, action items, and custom Smart Tags | Optional speaker diarization via PyAnnote |
| Languages & capture | Supports Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams web clients | Local summarization with a built-in Phi-4-mini model, plus Ollama and OpenAI-compatible backends |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM matching to contacts, deals, and accounts in Salesforce and HubSpot | Natural-language search across meeting notes with the ask command |
IceCubes
Choose IceCubes if you need teams that need notes without a bot joining due to it or compliance constraints — strengths include no visible recording bot, reducing meeting disruption and policy friction.
ownscribe
Choose ownscribe if you need developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac — strengths include runs entirely on-device with no data sent to external servers.
IceCubes
ownscribe
It depends on your workflow. IceCubes is strong for teams that need notes without a bot joining due to it or compliance constraints, while ownscribe is strong for developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
IceCubes is a free tier with paid upgrades and ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.