IceCubes and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. IceCubes: Bot-free Chrome and Edge extension that reads a meeting platform's own captions to transcribe and summarize Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist IceCubes when teams that need notes without a bot joining due to it or compliance constraints matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Bot-free Chrome and Edge extension that reads a meeting platform's own captions to transcribe and summarize Meet, Zoom, and Teams calls.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
IceCubes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | IceCubes | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Chrome and Edge browser extensions | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | Bot-free capture by reading the platform's own closed captions | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Speaker identification mapped from the meeting UI | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | AI summaries, action items, and custom Smart Tags | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Supports Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams web clients | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM matching to contacts, deals, and accounts in Salesforce and HubSpot | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
IceCubes
Choose IceCubes if you need teams that need notes without a bot joining due to it or compliance constraints — strengths include no visible recording bot, reducing meeting disruption and policy friction.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
IceCubes
Mina
It depends on your workflow. IceCubes is strong for teams that need notes without a bot joining due to it or compliance constraints, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
IceCubes is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.