Hyperia and Tucan.ai are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperia: A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations. Tucan.ai: Berlin-based AI meeting documentation tool with GDPR-compliant transcription, summaries, and German-hosted data. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperia when automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls matters most, and Tucan.ai when german and eu enterprises needing gdpr-compliant meeting documentation matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations.
Berlin-based AI meeting documentation tool with GDPR-compliant transcription, summaries, and German-hosted data.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tucan.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Hyperia | Tucan.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Notetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant | Automatic recording and live transcription for Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, and Webex |
| Standout feature | Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetings | Structured summaries and analyses with source attribution back to the transcript |
| Team usage | Programmable API to direct the notetaker and stream audio for analysis | Data hosted exclusively in Germany (Hetzner, Nuremberg) for GDPR compliance |
| Integrations | Transcription, summaries, action items, and highlights | Customizable access controls and automatic deletion policies |
| Languages & capture | Searchable knowledge base built from calls and meetings | On-premises deployment available on request |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM and SaaS integrations, including via Zapier | Pre-built and custom analysis templates |
Hyperia
Choose Hyperia if you need automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls — strengths include programmable api offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations.
Tucan.ai
Choose Tucan.ai if you need german and eu enterprises needing gdpr-compliant meeting documentation — strengths include strong data-protection posture with german-only hosting and gdpr focus.
Hyperia
Tucan.ai
It depends on your workflow. Hyperia is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls, while Tucan.ai is strong for german and eu enterprises needing gdpr-compliant meeting documentation. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tucan.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.