Hyperia and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperia: A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperia when automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Hyperia | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Notetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetings | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Programmable API to direct the notetaker and stream audio for analysis | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Transcription, summaries, action items, and highlights | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Searchable knowledge base built from calls and meetings | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM and SaaS integrations, including via Zapier | Automatic capture and transcription |
Hyperia
Choose Hyperia if you need automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls — strengths include programmable api offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Hyperia
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. Hyperia is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.