Hyperia and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperia: A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperia when automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Hyperia | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Notetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetings | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Programmable API to direct the notetaker and stream audio for analysis | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Transcription, summaries, action items, and highlights | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Searchable knowledge base built from calls and meetings | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM and SaaS integrations, including via Zapier | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Hyperia
Choose Hyperia if you need automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls — strengths include programmable api offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Hyperia
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Hyperia is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.