Hyperia and Shadow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperia: A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations. Shadow: A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperia when automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls matters most, and Shadow when capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations.
A bot-free, Mac-based AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes calls locally without joining as a participant.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Hyperia | Shadow |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Notetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant | Bot-free capture that records system audio without joining the meeting as a participant |
| Standout feature | Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetings | On-device (local) transcription on macOS |
| Team usage | Programmable API to direct the notetaker and stream audio for analysis | Speaker identification during transcription |
| Integrations | Transcription, summaries, action items, and highlights | Captures on-screen content in addition to spoken audio |
| Languages & capture | Searchable knowledge base built from calls and meetings | Customizable prompts/Skills to generate notes, summaries, and emails |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM and SaaS integrations, including via Zapier | Webhook integration to connect outputs to other tools |
Hyperia
Choose Hyperia if you need automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls — strengths include programmable api offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations.
Shadow
Choose Shadow if you need capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining — strengths include does not add a visible bot to meetings.
Hyperia
Shadow
It depends on your workflow. Hyperia is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls, while Shadow is strong for capturing notes and summaries across multiple conferencing platforms without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades and Shadow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.