Hyperia and Note67 are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperia: A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperia when automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls matters most, and Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations.
Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetingsCRM and SaaS integrations, including via ZapierNotetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Notetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant
Local on-device transcription using Whisper
Standout feature
Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetings
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Team usage
Programmable API to direct the notetaker and stream audio for analysis
Captures both microphone and system audio
Integrations
Transcription, summaries, action items, and highlights
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Languages & capture
Searchable knowledge base built from calls and meetings
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Best-fit workflow
CRM and SaaS integrations, including via Zapier
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Best for
Hyperia
Choose Hyperia if you need automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls — strengths include programmable api offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations.
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Pros & cons
Hyperia
+ Programmable API offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations
+ Turns meetings into a searchable knowledge base across conversations
- Notetaker joins as a visible participant rather than operating bot-free
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
FAQ
Is Hyperia or Note67 better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Hyperia is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls, while Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Hyperia and Note67 compare on price?
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades and Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Hyperia and Note67?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.