Hyperia and Mina are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperia: A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperia when automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls matters most, and Mina when providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Hyperia | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Notetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetings | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Programmable API to direct the notetaker and stream audio for analysis | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Transcription, summaries, action items, and highlights | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Searchable knowledge base built from calls and meetings | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM and SaaS integrations, including via Zapier | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
Hyperia
Choose Hyperia if you need automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls — strengths include programmable api offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Hyperia
Mina
It depends on your workflow. Hyperia is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.