Hyperia and joinly are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperia: A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations. joinly: Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperia when automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls matters most, and joinly when building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A programmable AI notetaker that joins online meetings as a participant to record, transcribe, and build searchable knowledge from conversations.
Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Hyperia | joinly |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Notetaker joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet as a participant | MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents |
| Standout feature | Automatic calendar detection and joining of scheduled meetings | Real-time transcription with timestamps and speaker information, subscribable for live updates |
| Team usage | Programmable API to direct the notetaker and stream audio for analysis | Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls |
| Integrations | Transcription, summaries, action items, and highlights | Modular speech-to-text and text-to-speech backends (Whisper, Deepgram, Kokoro, ElevenLabs) |
| Languages & capture | Searchable knowledge base built from calls and meetings | Model-agnostic: works with OpenAI, Anthropic, and local LLMs via Ollama |
| Best-fit workflow | CRM and SaaS integrations, including via Zapier | Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image |
Hyperia
Choose Hyperia if you need automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls — strengths include programmable api offers flexibility for custom workflows and integrations.
joinly
Choose joinly if you need building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls — strengths include fully open source (mit) and self-hostable for complete data control.
Hyperia
joinly
It depends on your workflow. Hyperia is strong for automatically capturing and summarizing recurring team or client calls, while joinly is strong for building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Hyperia is a free tier with paid upgrades and joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.