Hyperbound and Metaview are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Hyperbound: AI sales roleplay and call-scoring platform that lets reps practice with realistic AI buyers and scores real customer calls against custom scorecards. Metaview: AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Hyperbound when onboarding and ramping new sdrs and aes with repeatable roleplay practice matters most, and Metaview when recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI sales roleplay and call-scoring platform that lets reps practice with realistic AI buyers and scores real customer calls against custom scorecards.
AI notetaker and recruiting platform that joins interviews to auto-generate structured interview notes and feedback.
Hyperbound is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Hyperbound | Metaview |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI buyer personas for cold-call, discovery, and objection-handling roleplays | AI notetaker that joins recruiting and interview calls and captures the conversation |
| Standout feature | Automated scoring of real customer calls against custom scorecards | Automatic structured interview notes and summaries delivered when the call ends |
| Team usage | Support for sales methodologies like MEDDIC, BANT, Challenger, Sandler, and SPIN | Customizable note structures aligned to interview templates and scorecards |
| Integrations | Coaching playlists that surface skill gaps from scored calls | Bulk import of transcripts captured on other platforms |
| Languages & capture | Integrations with CRM and conversation-intelligence/sales-engagement tools | Reporting and analytics across interview conversations |
| Best-fit workflow | AI buyer personas for cold-call, discovery, and objection-handling roleplays | Candidate search and AI sourcing/screening agents within the wider platform |
Hyperbound
Choose Hyperbound if you need onboarding and ramping new sdrs and aes with repeatable roleplay practice — strengths include combines ai roleplay practice with scoring of real calls in one platform.
Metaview
Choose Metaview if you need recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls — strengths include purpose-built for the hiring-interview meeting type rather than generic notes.
Hyperbound
Metaview
It depends on your workflow. Hyperbound is strong for onboarding and ramping new sdrs and aes with repeatable roleplay practice, while Metaview is strong for recruiters capturing structured notes from candidate screening calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Hyperbound is a free tier with paid upgrades and Metaview is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.