HiDock and Note67 are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. HiDock: AI note-taking hardware (docks, recorders, mini devices) paired with the HiNotes app to transcribe and summarize meetings. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist HiDock when recording and summarizing in-person and conference-room meetings matters most, and Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI note-taking hardware (docks, recorders, mini devices) paired with the HiNotes app to transcribe and summarize meetings.
BlueCatch recording through standard Bluetooth earphonesBot-free capture that does not require others to join via an assistantHardware capture devices (docks, recorders, phone-call mini) for video, phone, and in-person meetings
HiDock is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Hardware capture devices (docks, recorders, phone-call mini) for video, phone, and in-person meetings
Local on-device transcription using Whisper
Standout feature
HiNotes companion app for transcription and AI summaries
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
Team usage
BlueCatch recording through standard Bluetooth earphones
Captures both microphone and system audio
Integrations
Profession-specific summary templates
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Languages & capture
Multi-language transcription support
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
Best-fit workflow
Bot-free capture that does not require others to join via an assistant
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Best for
HiDock
Choose HiDock if you need recording and summarizing in-person and conference-room meetings — strengths include dedicated hardware works well for in-person and mixed meetings, not just web calls.
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
Pros & cons
HiDock
+ Dedicated hardware works well for in-person and mixed meetings, not just web calls
+ No meeting bot needs to join the call to capture audio
- Requires purchasing and carrying a hardware device
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
FAQ
Is HiDock or Note67 better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. HiDock is strong for recording and summarizing in-person and conference-room meetings, while Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do HiDock and Note67 compare on price?
HiDock is a free tier with paid upgrades and Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both HiDock and Note67?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.