HeyMarvin and Koji are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. HeyMarvin: AI research assistant that records and transcribes user-research interviews and builds a searchable insights repository. Koji: AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist HeyMarvin when ux researchers transcribing and tagging user-interview calls matters most, and Koji when running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI research assistant that records and transcribes user-research interviews and builds a searchable insights repository.
AI-native customer research platform whose AI interviewer runs voice and text discovery conversations at scale, then synthesizes themes automatically.
HeyMarvin is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | HeyMarvin | Koji |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records and automatically transcribes user-research interview calls | AI interviewer that runs asynchronous voice and text discovery conversations at scale |
| Standout feature | Time-stamped notes and collaborative live note-taking during sessions | AI research agent that drafts research goals and interview guides from a brief |
| Team usage | AI thematic analysis that clusters feedback into themes and patterns | Automatic per-interview analysis with key moments and sentiment |
| Integrations | Ask AI querying across research data with citations to source clips | Cross-interview synthesis into study-wide themes, patterns, and recommendations |
| Languages & capture | Searchable centralized research repository combining many data sources | Insights traceable back to specific participant quotes |
| Best-fit workflow | Video clips, highlight reels, and insight reports for sharing findings | MCP integrations with Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Notion |
HeyMarvin
Choose HeyMarvin if you need ux researchers transcribing and tagging user-interview calls — strengths include tailored to user-research interviews rather than generic meeting notes.
Koji
Choose Koji if you need running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls — strengths include removes scheduling overhead by running many interviews in parallel and asynchronously.
HeyMarvin
Koji
It depends on your workflow. HeyMarvin is strong for ux researchers transcribing and tagging user-interview calls, while Koji is strong for running exploratory discovery interviews without scheduling live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
HeyMarvin is a free tier with paid upgrades and Koji is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.