Great Question and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Great Question: All-in-one UX research platform combining recruitment, scheduling, and AI analysis of interviews into a connected research repository. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Great Question when recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
All-in-one UX research platform combining recruitment, scheduling, and AI analysis of interviews into a connected research repository.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Great Question is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Great Question | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI analysis generating summaries, chapters, highlights, and tags from interviews | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Searchable research repository connecting transcripts, themes, and insights | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Participant recruitment from a large panel plus CRM-based custom panels | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Scheduling, screening, eligibility rules, and incentive payments | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Moderated, AI-moderated, and unmoderated study methods including prototype testing | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | 50+ integrations plus an MCP for running research from AI tools | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Great Question
Choose Great Question if you need recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end — strengths include handles recruitment, study execution, and analysis in one platform.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Great Question
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Great Question is strong for recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Great Question is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.