Great Question and Minutes are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Great Question: All-in-one UX research platform combining recruitment, scheduling, and AI analysis of interviews into a connected research repository. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-notes, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-notes workflows, shortlist Great Question when recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end matters most, and Minutes when building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
All-in-one UX research platform combining recruitment, scheduling, and AI analysis of interviews into a connected research repository.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
Great Question is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Great Question | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI analysis generating summaries, chapters, highlights, and tags from interviews | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload |
| Standout feature | Searchable research repository connecting transcripts, themes, and insights | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what |
| Team usage | Participant recruitment from a large panel plus CRM-based custom panels | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk |
| Integrations | Scheduling, screening, eligibility rules, and incentive payments | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history |
| Languages & capture | Moderated, AI-moderated, and unmoderated study methods including prototype testing | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction |
| Best-fit workflow | 50+ integrations plus an MCP for running research from AI tools | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode |
Great Question
Choose Great Question if you need recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end — strengths include handles recruitment, study execution, and analysis in one platform.
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
Great Question
Minutes
It depends on your workflow. Great Question is strong for recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end, while Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Great Question is a free tier with paid upgrades and Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.