Grava AI and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Grava AI: Brazilian AI meeting recorder app (by MeuGuru) that records, transcribes with speaker identification, summarizes meetings and answers questions about recordings. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Grava AI when recording and transcribing in-person business meetings on a phone matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Brazilian AI meeting recorder app (by MeuGuru) that records, transcribes with speaker identification, summarizes meetings and answers questions about recordings.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Grava AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Grava AI | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio recording with automatic transcription and speaker identification | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | AI-generated summaries with automatically detected topics | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Interactive chat to ask questions about a recording | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | To-Do feature that turns recordings into editable task lists | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Professional PDF report generation | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Automatic pause and resume during incoming phone calls | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Grava AI
Choose Grava AI if you need recording and transcribing in-person business meetings on a phone — strengths include transcription engine oriented to brazilian portuguese, with spanish and english support.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Grava AI
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Grava AI is strong for recording and transcribing in-person business meetings on a phone, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Grava AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.