Grava AI and Speakr are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Grava AI: Brazilian AI meeting recorder app (by MeuGuru) that records, transcribes with speaker identification, summarizes meetings and answers questions about recordings. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Grava AI when recording and transcribing in-person business meetings on a phone matters most, and Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Brazilian AI meeting recorder app (by MeuGuru) that records, transcribes with speaker identification, summarizes meetings and answers questions about recordings.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Grava AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Grava AI | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Audio recording with automatic transcription and speaker identification | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | AI-generated summaries with automatically detected topics | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Interactive chat to ask questions about a recording | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | To-Do feature that turns recordings into editable task lists | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Professional PDF report generation | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Automatic pause and resume during incoming phone calls | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Grava AI
Choose Grava AI if you need recording and transcribing in-person business meetings on a phone — strengths include transcription engine oriented to brazilian portuguese, with spanish and english support.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Grava AI
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Grava AI is strong for recording and transcribing in-person business meetings on a phone, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Grava AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.