EventCAT and Fast Rekap are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. Fast Rekap: iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist EventCAT when providing multilingual live subtitles and audio at in-person conferences and seminars matters most, and Fast Rekap when recording meetings and turning them into shareable slide decks matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings.
Conference mode with per-session QR codes for attendees plus main-screen subtitle displayCustom glossaries for industry and proper-noun accuracyIntegrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, YouTube, and OBS
iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A.
EventCAT vs Fast Rekap: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo
AI summaries highlighting decisions and action itemsAutomatic generation of presentation slide decksChat-with-transcript Q&A
EventCAT is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Fast Rekap is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time AI subtitles and synthesized voice interpretation in 50+ languages
One-tap recording and accurate speech-to-text transcription
Standout feature
Conference mode with per-session QR codes for attendees plus main-screen subtitle display
AI summaries highlighting decisions and action items
Team usage
Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, YouTube, and OBS
Automatic generation of presentation slide decks
Integrations
Selectable speed-prioritized and accuracy-prioritized translation modes
Mind-map generation from transcripts
Languages & capture
Custom glossaries for industry and proper-noun accuracy
Chat-with-transcript Q&A
Best-fit workflow
Post-event downloadable multilingual transcripts and AI summaries
PDF export and automatic email delivery of summaries and transcripts
Best for
EventCAT
Choose EventCAT if you need providing multilingual live subtitles and audio at in-person conferences and seminars — strengths include combines both live captions and voice interpretation in one platform.
Fast Rekap
Choose Fast Rekap if you need recording meetings and turning them into shareable slide decks — strengths include goes beyond notes to produce slides and mind maps.
Pros & cons
EventCAT
+ Combines both live captions and voice interpretation in one platform
+ Works for online meetings, in-person conferences, and streaming setups
- Pricing is not published and may require contacting the vendor for events
Fast Rekap
+ Goes beyond notes to produce slides and mind maps
+ Broad multilingual transcription support
- Available only on iOS (no Android or desktop app)
FAQ
Is EventCAT or Fast Rekap better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. EventCAT is strong for providing multilingual live subtitles and audio at in-person conferences and seminars, while Fast Rekap is strong for recording meetings and turning them into shareable slide decks. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do EventCAT and Fast Rekap compare on price?
EventCAT is a free tier with paid upgrades and Fast Rekap is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both EventCAT and Fast Rekap?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.