Cuebo and Daisy are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Cuebo: AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis. Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Cuebo when reps practicing pitches and full demos against video-avatar buyers matters most, and Daisy when recording and transcribing meetings privately on a mac without cloud upload matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis.
Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server.
Cuebo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Daisy is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Cuebo | Daisy |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | AI Roleplay Arena with customizable video-avatar buyer personas built from real conversations | Local recording of mic and system audio from any source via ScreenCaptureKit |
| Standout feature | Instant post-call feedback and scoring, including screen-share demo practice | On-device transcription with WhisperKit and speaker diarization via Pyannote |
| Team usage | AI Trainer that auto-generates training modules from decks, PDFs, and playbooks | Structured AI notes with action items and follow-ups |
| Integrations | Smart Coach for personalized coaching with objection-handling drills and call memory | Multiple summarization backends: Apple Intelligence, Anthropic, OpenAI, and MCP |
| Languages & capture | Call recording and transcription for manager review of customer interactions | Local MCP server so Claude Desktop, Cursor, and similar tools can read meetings |
| Best-fit workflow | Management dashboards, gamification, and support for 20+ languages | Exports to Notion, Linear, Attio, Slack, or custom webhooks |
Cuebo
Choose Cuebo if you need reps practicing pitches and full demos against video-avatar buyers — strengths include video-avatar personas and screen sharing enable realistic demo practice.
Daisy
Choose Daisy if you need recording and transcribing meetings privately on a mac without cloud upload — strengths include fully local-first with audio kept on-device unless a cloud llm is explicitly enabled.
Cuebo
Daisy
It depends on your workflow. Cuebo is strong for reps practicing pitches and full demos against video-avatar buyers, while Daisy is strong for recording and transcribing meetings privately on a mac without cloud upload. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Cuebo is a free tier with paid upgrades and Daisy is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.