Cogram and Fellow are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Cogram: AI platform for the architecture, engineering and construction industry that automates meeting minutes and action items with strong privacy controls. Fellow: Meeting-management app for agendas, collaborative notes, action items, and AI summaries across your team's meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Cogram when construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes matters most, and Fellow when one-on-ones and team meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI platform for the architecture, engineering and construction industry that automates meeting minutes and action items with strong privacy controls.
Additional tools for RFIs, submittals, field reports and email managementAutomated meeting minutes for virtual and in-person meetingsIntegrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Procore and Autodesk
Cogram is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Fellow is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automated meeting minutes for virtual and in-person meetings
Collaborative agendas and notes
Standout feature
Template-driven notes, decisions and action item capture
AI meeting summaries
Team usage
Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Procore and Autodesk
Action items and follow-ups
Integrations
Additional tools for RFIs, submittals, field reports and email management
Recording and transcription (Zoom, Meet, Teams)
Languages & capture
SOC 2 Type II certification with SSO, MFA and role-based access controls
Agenda templates for recurring meetings
Best-fit workflow
Private-cloud or on-premises deployment options
Collaborative agendas and notes
Best for
Cogram
Choose Cogram if you need construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes — strengths include tailored to aec documentation needs with customizable templates.
Fellow
Choose Fellow if you need one-on-ones and team meetings — strengths include strong focus on agendas, action items, and follow-through.
Pros & cons
Cogram
+ Tailored to AEC documentation needs with customizable templates
+ Strong privacy posture, including no model training on customer data
- Designed for the AEC industry, so less suited to general-purpose teams
Fellow
+ Strong focus on agendas, action items, and follow-through
+ Good for recurring one-on-ones and team meetings
- More of a meeting-workflow tool than a pure transcription service
FAQ
Is Cogram or Fellow better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Cogram is strong for construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes, while Fellow is strong for one-on-ones and team meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Cogram and Fellow compare on price?
Cogram is a free tier with paid upgrades and Fellow is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Cogram and Fellow?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.