CLOVA Note and Cogram are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. CLOVA Note: South Korean AI meeting-minutes service by Naver that records meetings, transcribes speech, separates speakers, and generates summaries and action items. Cogram: AI platform for the architecture, engineering and construction industry that automates meeting minutes and action items with strong privacy controls. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-meeting-summary-tools, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-meeting-summary-tools workflows, shortlist CLOVA Note when korean-language teams generating automatic meeting minutes matters most, and Cogram when construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
South Korean AI meeting-minutes service by Naver that records meetings, transcribes speech, separates speakers, and generates summaries and action items.
AI summaries, topics, and next-step suggestionsAutomatic speech-to-text transcriptionCustom vocabulary registration for industry terms
CLOVA Note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Cogram is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Automated meeting minutes for virtual and in-person meetings
Standout feature
Automatic speech-to-text transcription
Template-driven notes, decisions and action item capture
Team usage
Speaker diarization to distinguish participants
Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Procore and Autodesk
Integrations
AI summaries, topics, and next-step suggestions
Additional tools for RFIs, submittals, field reports and email management
Languages & capture
Multilingual support (Korean, English, Japanese, Chinese)
SOC 2 Type II certification with SSO, MFA and role-based access controls
Best-fit workflow
Custom vocabulary registration for industry terms
Private-cloud or on-premises deployment options
Best for
CLOVA Note
Choose CLOVA Note if you need korean-language teams generating automatic meeting minutes — strengths include strong korean-language recognition from a major regional provider.
Cogram
Choose Cogram if you need construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes — strengths include tailored to aec documentation needs with customizable templates.
Pros & cons
CLOVA Note
+ Strong Korean-language recognition from a major regional provider
+ Speaker separation and AI summaries built in
- Interface and support are heavily oriented toward Korean users
Cogram
+ Tailored to AEC documentation needs with customizable templates
+ Strong privacy posture, including no model training on customer data
- Designed for the AEC industry, so less suited to general-purpose teams
FAQ
Is CLOVA Note or Cogram better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. CLOVA Note is strong for korean-language teams generating automatic meeting minutes, while Cogram is strong for construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do CLOVA Note and Cogram compare on price?
CLOVA Note is a free tier with paid upgrades and Cogram is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both CLOVA Note and Cogram?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
CLOVA Note vs Cogram: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo