Bubbles and Cogram are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Bubbles: AI meeting notetaker and screen recorder that records calls, generates summaries and action items, and enables async video follow-ups. Cogram: AI platform for the architecture, engineering and construction industry that automates meeting minutes and action items with strong privacy controls. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Bubbles when teams replacing status meetings with async video updates matters most, and Cogram when construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI meeting notetaker and screen recorder that records calls, generates summaries and action items, and enables async video follow-ups.
AI platform for the architecture, engineering and construction industry that automates meeting minutes and action items with strong privacy controls.
Bubbles is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Cogram is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Bubbles | Cogram |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic meeting recording across Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Zoom | Automated meeting minutes for virtual and in-person meetings |
| Standout feature | AI-generated summaries and action item extraction | Template-driven notes, decisions and action item capture |
| Team usage | Async screen and video recording for replacing live meetings | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, Procore and Autodesk |
| Integrations | Threaded video and text replies on recordings | Additional tools for RFIs, submittals, field reports and email management |
| Languages & capture | Calendar integration with note and recording organization | SOC 2 Type II certification with SSO, MFA and role-based access controls |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, Notion, Asana and many other tools | Private-cloud or on-premises deployment options |
Bubbles
Choose Bubbles if you need teams replacing status meetings with async video updates — strengths include combines live meeting notes with async video collaboration in one tool.
Cogram
Choose Cogram if you need construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes — strengths include tailored to aec documentation needs with customizable templates.
Bubbles
Cogram
It depends on your workflow. Bubbles is strong for teams replacing status meetings with async video updates, while Cogram is strong for construction and engineering firms automating project meeting minutes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Bubbles is a free tier with paid upgrades and Cogram is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.