Attendee and AudiosTranscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Attendee: Open-source, self-hostable meeting bot API that sends bots into Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams to capture recordings and transcripts. AudiosTranscribe: French-focused, bot-free meeting transcription tool with European inference, summaries, action plans, and automatic audio deletion. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Attendee when developers embedding meeting recording and transcription into their own saas products matters most, and AudiosTranscribe when transcribing french meetings without a visible bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hostable meeting bot API that sends bots into Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams to capture recordings and transcripts.
French-focused, bot-free meeting transcription tool with European inference, summaries, action plans, and automatic audio deletion.
Attendee is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); AudiosTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Attendee | AudiosTranscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Unified REST API for deploying bots to Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams | Bot-free transcription via uploads or a desktop recording app |
| Standout feature | Meeting recording and transcript retrieval through API endpoints | Verbatim transcripts with timestamps and automatic speaker naming |
| Team usage | Real-time media pipeline with websocket audio input/output | Analysis tabs for summary, action plan, context and transcription |
| Integrations | Webhooks for event-driven workflows | European inference across multiple EU regions with AES-256 encryption |
| Languages & capture | Calendar integration and scheduled-meeting support | Automatic deletion of audio after transcription |
| Best-fit workflow | Single Docker image self-hosting built on Django, PostgreSQL, and Redis | Bot-free transcription via uploads or a desktop recording app |
Attendee
Choose Attendee if you need developers embedding meeting recording and transcription into their own saas products — strengths include fully open source and designed for convenient self-hosting, keeping meeting data on your own infrastructure.
AudiosTranscribe
Choose AudiosTranscribe if you need transcribing french meetings without a visible bot in the call — strengths include no bot joins the meeting, supporting more private, less disruptive capture.
Attendee
AudiosTranscribe
It depends on your workflow. Attendee is strong for developers embedding meeting recording and transcription into their own saas products, while AudiosTranscribe is strong for transcribing french meetings without a visible bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Attendee is a free tier with paid upgrades and AudiosTranscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.