Acta.ai and Anarlog are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Acta.ai: India-built AI meeting assistant that joins calls, transcribes, and produces role-specific summaries, decisions, and action items. Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Acta.ai when sales discovery calls that need deal briefs and follow-up tasks matters most, and Anarlog when engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
India-built AI meeting assistant that joins calls, transcribes, and produces role-specific summaries, decisions, and action items.
Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot.
Acta.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Anarlog is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Acta.ai | Anarlog |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic meeting join, recording, and transcription across Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom | Bot-free capture via local system-audio recording |
| Standout feature | AI-generated summaries with key topics and takeaways | Local transcription with notes merged into structured summaries |
| Team usage | Action item generation and tracking | Data stored as files on the user's own device |
| Integrations | Persona-based agents for functions like Sales, Engineering, Finance, and HR | Choice of local AI models or bring-your-own API keys |
| Languages & capture | 'Ask Acta' assistant for querying meeting insights | Open-source codebase available on GitHub |
| Best-fit workflow | Chrome extension and calendar integration | Action-item extraction from meeting notes |
Acta.ai
Choose Acta.ai if you need sales discovery calls that need deal briefs and follow-up tasks — strengths include built and operated from india with a focus on turning meetings into structured follow-up work.
Anarlog
Choose Anarlog if you need engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes — strengths include open source with a publicly available codebase.
Acta.ai
Anarlog
It depends on your workflow. Acta.ai is strong for sales discovery calls that need deal briefs and follow-up tasks, while Anarlog is strong for engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Acta.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades and Anarlog is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.