123 Notetaker AI and Acta.ai are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. 123 Notetaker AI: Microsoft Teams marketplace app from BlueSky Apps that shows live transcription in the Teams sidebar and emails AI meeting notes afterward. Acta.ai: India-built AI meeting assistant that joins calls, transcribes, and produces role-specific summaries, decisions, and action items. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist 123 Notetaker AI when teams-centric organizations that do not have or want copilot licenses matters most, and Acta.ai when sales discovery calls that need deal briefs and follow-up tasks matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Microsoft Teams marketplace app from BlueSky Apps that shows live transcription in the Teams sidebar and emails AI meeting notes afterward.
Automatic AI meeting summary emailed after the meetingFree plan with paid upgrade tiersNative Microsoft Teams app installed from the commercial marketplace
123 Notetaker AI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Acta.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Native Microsoft Teams app installed from the commercial marketplace
Automatic meeting join, recording, and transcription across Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Zoom
Standout feature
Real-time transcription displayed in the Teams app sidebar
AI-generated summaries with key topics and takeaways
Team usage
Automatic AI meeting summary emailed after the meeting
Action item generation and tracking
Integrations
Notes and transcripts stored in a BlueSky account for later access
Persona-based agents for functions like Sales, Engineering, Finance, and HR
Languages & capture
Works without requiring Microsoft Copilot licensing
'Ask Acta' assistant for querying meeting insights
Best-fit workflow
Free plan with paid upgrade tiers
Chrome extension and calendar integration
Best for
123 Notetaker AI
Choose 123 Notetaker AI if you need teams-centric organizations that do not have or want copilot licenses — strengths include runs inside teams with no separate app or browser extension to manage.
Acta.ai
Choose Acta.ai if you need sales discovery calls that need deal briefs and follow-up tasks — strengths include built and operated from india with a focus on turning meetings into structured follow-up work.
Pros & cons
123 Notetaker AI
+ Runs inside Teams with no separate app or browser extension to manage
+ Provides an alternative to Copilot-based note-taking for Teams users
- Limited to Microsoft Teams rather than multiple meeting platforms in one app
Acta.ai
+ Built and operated from India with a focus on turning meetings into structured follow-up work
+ Role-specific outputs go beyond plain transcripts
- Relies on an agent/bot joining the call rather than a bot-free capture model
FAQ
Is 123 Notetaker AI or Acta.ai better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. 123 Notetaker AI is strong for teams-centric organizations that do not have or want copilot licenses, while Acta.ai is strong for sales discovery calls that need deal briefs and follow-up tasks. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do 123 Notetaker AI and Acta.ai compare on price?
123 Notetaker AI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Acta.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both 123 Notetaker AI and Acta.ai?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.